ROAD
HOGS
Before
going any further, it might be good for you to read my daughter's
musings on the subject at hand – why her over-age daddy would want
to open a Facebook account.
(http://mylifeisacosmicjoke.blogspot.co.il
– Aug. 6, 2013)
If
I wanted to be flippant (not me!), I might say that I got onto
Facebook because I was bored one day and had nothing much else to do
at the time. When Natania was faced with a similar situation, she
went out and had her hair dyed blonde. That didn't seem like a
reasonable option for me, so I sat down at BigMac and went to the
Facebook home page.
It
was something I had been thinking about for a long time. I knew
there was this beast out there that was taking over the world and
causing people to waste a lot of time in idle chatter. What would be
the benefit to me? Did I need to continue my boycott in order to
maintain my curmudgeonly image? Things to consider.
There
was, I had come to realize, a lot of information and social discourse
that I was not privy to. Many of the cultural events in Jerusalem
that would be of interest to me were promoted primarily on Facebook.
Aviella's concerts, Shakespeare in the Rough. Good stuff like that,
things that were coming and going without my knowledge or
involvement. Even though there is still a heavily monitored and
cumbersome MA-chat e-mail group, most of the give and take here in
Anglo Ma'ale Adumim goes on within the confines of the MA Facebook
group. You want to exchange opinions about the up-coming municipal
elections or ask questions about the bus service here in town? It's
either Facebook or stand on the merpeset
and holler. I wasn't sure how, but I figured I could also publicize
my own efforts, both my articles and, in the future, my web page of
photographs – may I live long enough to do it. Then there's a
time-tested maxim: If you can't lick 'em, join 'em. There's no point
in standing outside the stadium wondering what the score is on the
field.
Believe
it or not, up to that point I had never even seen a Facebook page and
was fairly clueless as to how the thing worked. Yes, you can post
things on your page and you have “friends,” but that's sort of
nebulous; there's more to it than that. One way to find out. So I
opened an account and entered my information.
There's
one thing that concerns any Facebook neophyte: how do you hook up
with other people? Of course, it's as easy as pie; in fact, it may
be too easy. Facebook will help you connect with any of the billion
or so people around the world who have accounts. You can start with
anyone and everyone on your e-mail list who has a Facebook account
and anybody they know or you know or you might know or someone thinks
you may want to know. Or someone decides they want to be your
friend. There's a delicate bit of etiquette in play here. You can't
just be someone's Facebook friend. You have to ask permission, and
you have to be accepted. Of course, the reverse is also true. You
get a little note: somebody wants to be your friend. What do you do?
It may be a long-lost friend from high school, and you're delighted
to be in touch. But what if it's a friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend
and you have no idea who it is? Or even worse: you have a very good
idea who it is and you're not so sure you want them involved in your
daily affairs? Is it rude to say no thanks, have a good day? Or to
ignore the request? Would that be considered unmannerly? As they
say around the Volga: “Vat to doooo?”
At
this point in time, I have ninety-two Facebook friends, who can be
divided
– unlike Gaul – in five unequal parts: the locals (friends and
acquaintances from Ma'ale Adumim), Encore!
(people
who I've met doing through our shows), a few other people I know in
Israel, folks back home (from Passaic and Teaneck), and a miscellany
(a few friends from the old days and school mates). It did occur to
me one day: what do all these people have in common? The answer: not
a lot, except for having the dubious privilege of knowing me.
I
also began to wonder: I have (as I said) ninety-two Facebook friends.
But there are people who have more than 500. I get more stuff on my
home page than I can possibly handle, even if I wanted to make
Facebook my main preoccupation. How much stuff would you get if you
had 500 friends? I shudder to think.
When
I refer to “stuff,” I'm alluding to the posts that people see fit
to send out to the multitudes: all kinds of information that my
Facebook friends seem to feel I need to know about. A lot of it is
about them and their families: photos, anecdotes of various kinds.
Some of it is well worth sharing, but some of it does not seem of
much consequence: how well a person did or did not sleep the previous
night, how much one is in need of a cup of coffee, a pet peeve that
only one's immediate neighbors might relate to – like a bus not
showing up on time, or some other frustration of a garden variety.
Then there's the political stuff: a lot of it regarding the current
occupant of the White House, by and from people who are even more
politically conservative than I am (How is that even possible?).
Throw in a collection of recipes and the usual potpourri of things
humorous and bizarre floating around the world wide web, and you get
an idea of what I'm bombarded with on a daily basis.
It's
not any particular post that bothers me. (That's not true: I have an
almost irresistible urge to impair the typing fingers of all those
who insists on informing me that they beat so-and-so in Candy Crush
or some other mind-numbing activity.) The problem, as I see it, is
what I affectionately refer to as the “road hogs.”
One
of W.C. Fields' best remembered screen roles was in a 1932 film
entitled “If I Had a Million,” the premise of which is that, on
his death bed, a multi-millionaire directs his secretary to select
eight people at random from the telephone book and give them each one
million dollars. Hence, eight episodes, the relevant one being “Road
Hogs,” with W.C. and his partner, Alison Skipworth. The two of
them are set to take their new (vintage 1932) automobile out for a
spin. No sooner do they get out of their driveway, when their
vehicle is totaled by some fool who ran a stop sign (this being
before anybody ever though of car insurance). Shortly thereafter,
our couple is given a million smackaroos, and they buy another car
plus a fleet of old jalopies. They hire a crew of drivers and set
off down the road, looking for road hogs. Whenever they find someone
who is a menace on the road, W.C. cries out, as only he could,“road
hog,” the signal for his team of demolition experts to go to work.
You've seen videos of car crashes? This is way funnier. At the close
of the scene, their own car is again wrecked. Nonetheless, it has
been a “glorious day.”
Look
at it this way. Let's say you have 100 Facebook friends. Some of
them you're hoping are still breathing because you never hear from
them. Some you hear from – if nothing more than to indicate a
“like” – once in a blue moon. Still others post once in a
while: once every few weeks. Some more frequently: every couple of
days. And so on. If you were so inclined, or had nothing else to do,
you might plot the frequency of other people's posts arriving on your
home page. What I suspect is that most of us would wind up with the
well-known bell-shaped curve, meaning most of your friends would be
somewhere comfortably in the middle, people who post with some
frequency but don't get carried away with what they're doing. But if
you have the Silent Sam's on one end of the chart, what about the
other side? That's where you find the compulsive posters, the ones
who overwhelm you with their own musings and whatever else they can
dig up to entertain and enlighten you.
Now
I'm sure that everything that is posted is of interest to some of the
recipients. The question is, how many? Suppose you had the ability
to rate each post you get for interest to you – more than just
“like.” How about the one to ten scale, descending from “thanks
a million” to “why are you even thinking of wasting my time?”
Perhaps, in certain special circumstances one needs to be assertive
in protest against absolute irrelevancy– if not quite as aggressive
as W.C. Fields. When I was first writing this, I noticed something
on my home page, in which the poster wrote X that he was not going to
speak to her until she apologized (for what I don't know). To which
I responded, “This
seems to be a private conversation that a lot of people don't need to
see.” Within one second of hitting the enter key, I got a “like”
from another friend of the friend.
But
in less provocative situations, how do you tell someone you know,
“The first two/three/four/five (political cartoons, recipes,
articles, pictures of your pet, cute things your child has said) were
fine, but don't you think you're overdoing it a little? I know you
don't mean to, but you're simply hogging the road, so I'm no longer
in control of my own home page.” And it's not just the original
post. Someone else decides he likes it and “shares” it, so you
may see it a second or third time. Then there's the post that gets
everyone's attention, prompting dozens of `'likes,” and on a good
or bad day, comments up the wazoo, both to the original post and the
comments on the comments – all taking up more room.
So
now, I'm in the middle of the virtual highway, trying to catch up
with the one post that interests me – say, Mark Steyn's weekly
column that Ron punctiliously send out or Rachel Miskin's imaginative
“Cake of the Week,” describing her latest incredible creation.
Or posts from people on the special interest groups I belong to: “Hot
Jazz Records,” “Film Noir,” or “Pre-Code Hollywood.” Yet
when I find something intriguing, should I turn away for a moment,
that post is gone because ten other posts have arrived and have
crowded mine off the road. I don't want to start up with people I
know. Again, “Vat to dooooo?” Fortunately, for all concerned,
there are ways of protecting my lane that are less drastic that W.C.
Field's solution. I don't have to start smashing other people's
keyboards – even if I have the irresistible urge to do so. A
discrete, well placed click of the mouse will remove a lot of the
traffic on my Facebook highway, so I can “drive” safely and have
“a
glorious day.”
“Road hogs,” beware!
No comments:
Post a Comment